Japan says second nuke plant blast possible
Tokyo (AFP) March 13, 2011 Japan's top government spokesman Sunday warned of the risk of a second explosion at the quake-hit Fukushima nuclear plant, but said that reactor three could withstand it as reactor one did a day earlier. "There is the possibility of an explosion in the number three reactor, as in the case of the first reactor," Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano told a televised press conference -- but he added that the reactor would survive and that there would be no adverse affect on the health of nearby residents. He said the risk of a second explosion had been heightened by a hydrogen buildup in reactor three when cooling water levels fell. The nuclear plant's operator has been pumping seawater into the reactor to reduce the heat, caused by a cooling system failure after Friday's massive earthquake. Edano said that in an explosion, parts of the reactor may become deformed, but voiced confidence that it would survive the impact, as reactor one did in Saturday's blast, and that there would not be a nuclear meltdown. "The situation would not affect human health, but we are making this announcement because we cannot rule out the possibility of an explosion incident," Edano told the press conference.
earlier related report About 200,000 people have been evacuated from residential areas around the Fukushima No. 1 plant, 250 kilometres (120 miles) north of Tokyo, as global concern grew over the threat of a major disaster. International nuclear experts warned of the possibility of major accidents similar to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine and the 1979 partial core meltdown of the US Three Mile Island reactor. Japan's top government spokesman said it was highly likely a meltdown had occurred in one reactor of the Fukushima plant and that it was working on the assumption that one may occur in another. Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano added that the radiation released into the air so far had not reached levels high enough to affect human health. The crisis started with Friday's massive quake and tsunami disaster, the worst on record in Japan, which caused electricity blackouts and led to malfunctions of the cooling systems of the plant's reactors. Authorities immediately declared a nuclear emergency and have since scrambled to prevent two reactors from overheating by pumping in water and releasing steam to depressurise them. Operator Tokyo Electric Power (TEPCO) took the drastic step of using sea water to cool reactor one -- where a huge explosion Saturday tore away the outer concrete housing while leaving the steel reactor intact. On Sunday, the operator warned that another reactor, number three, was also overheating and that so much water had evaporated at one stage that the top three metres (10 feet) of mixed oxide (MOX) fuel rods were exposed to the air. A TEPCO spokesman later told AFP that the rods were covered again. Edano said the pressure build-up at reactor three had forced another release of vapor to depressurise the facility and that "we assume that a minute amount of radioactivity was released". Nuclear plant operators must alert the government when the hourly level of radioactivity reaches 500 micro sievert -- and Edano said the level had topped 1,200 Sunday morning. It had hit just over 1,000 at one stage Saturday. A TEPCO spokesman said Sunday: "Radiation levels declined late last night but rebounded this morning and topped the limit set by the government. So, we informed the government about the result in an emergency report." The government has evacuated people from a 20 kilometre (12 mile) radius around the facility -- while also moving people out of areas surrounding a second nearby plant, Fukushima No. 2, which has four reactors. A total of 22 people have also been hospitalised after being exposed to radioactivity, although it was not immediately clear to what degree they were exposed and what the condition they were in. In the city of Fukushima, set amid mountains some 80 kilometres northwest of the seaside plants, fears grew about the nuclear plants, and people rushed to stock up on supplies. Petrol stations had already run dry. Hundreds joined orderly queues outside a co-op market where shop assistants wore surgical masks and overalls, and shoppers came out carrying as many bottles of water, groceries and other supplies as they could. Naruki Ono, 40, who had travelled 40 minutes to get to the town, said "people are nervous. People are not panicked, but nuclear plants are scary. The bottom line is: I will pray that the nuclear plant doesn't explode." Japan's centre-left Prime Minister Naoto Kan, who was battling opinion poll ratings below 20 percent before the disaster struck, faced media criticism on Sunday over his government's response to the nuclear crisis. The Yomiuri Shimbun daily noted that it took five hours for the government to publicly address fears about a nuclear meltdown after the blast Saturday, while an Asahi Shimbun headline charged: "Crisis management all mixed up".
Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Nuclear Power News - Nuclear Science, Nuclear Technology Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com
Meltdowns may have occurred in two reactors: Japan govt Tokyo (AFP) March 13, 2011 Japan's top government spokesman Yukio Edano said Sunday that radioactive meltdowns may have occurred in two reactors of the quake-hit Fukushima nuclear plant. Asked in a press conference whether meltdowns had occurred, Edano said "we are acting on the assumption that there is a high possibility that one has occurred" in the plant's number-one reactor. "As for the number-three reactor, w ... read more |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |